DES2.L vs. DRGG.L
DES2.L (L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and DRGG.L (L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - DES2.L is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while DRGG.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan China Custom Liquid ESG Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DES2.L returned -20.02%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for DRGG.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DES2.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DRGG.L.
Performance
DES2.L vs. DRGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DES2.L is traded in EUR, while DRGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DRGG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DES2.L achieves a -3.94% return, which is significantly lower than DRGG.L's 5.79% return.
DES2.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- -3.94%
- 1Y
- -5.81%
- 3Y*
- -24.09%
- 5Y*
- -20.02%
- 10Y*
- -23.50%
DRGG.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
DES2.L vs. DRGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES2.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -3.94% | -36.17% | -25.21% | -28.29% | 7.83% | -31.54% | -6.57% |
DRGG.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.79% | -6.86% | 9.85% | -2.99% | 0.48% | 15.58% | -25.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DES2.L and DRGG.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DES2.L vs. DRGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
DES2.L
DRGG.L
DES2.L vs. DRGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L) and L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DRGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DES2.L | DRGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.61 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 7.42 | -7.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DES2.L vs. DRGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DES2.L drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than DRGG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES2.L and DRGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DES2.L | DRGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -25.95% | -73.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.84% | -2.93% | -22.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.96% | -10.96% | -56.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.04% | -13.83% | -64.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.54% | -8.91% | -90.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.79% | -14.26% | -73.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.24% | 1.03% | +11.21% |
Volatility
DES2.L vs. DRGG.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DRGG.L) at 1.09%. This indicates that DES2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DES2.L | DRGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 1.09% | +8.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.01% | 4.33% | +22.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.05% | 5.69% | +26.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.21% | 6.98% | +27.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.12% | 12.63% | +23.49% |
DES2.L vs. DRGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DES2.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DES2.L vs. DRGG.L - Dividend Comparison
DES2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES2.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRGG.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.01% | 2.04% | 2.27% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DES2.L and DRGG.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DES2.L.
DES2.L is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DRGG.L is Government Bonds. DES2.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while DRGG.L tracks J.P. Morgan China Custom Liquid ESG Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DES2.L and 0.30% for DRGG.L.
Find the right allocation for DES2.L and DRGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer