DES2.L vs. AUCO.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

DES2.L (L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and AUCO.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DES2.L is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while AUCO.L is a Gold fund tracking the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DES2.L returned -23.54%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for AUCO.L. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. DES2.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AUCO.L.

Performance

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DES2.L is traded in EUR, while AUCO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AUCO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES2.L achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly higher than AUCO.L's -12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DES2.L has underperformed AUCO.L with an annualized return of -23.54%, while AUCO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.

DES2.L

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -0.95%
• 6M: -0.56%
• YTD: -5.68%
• 1Y: -9.69%
• 3Y*: -24.55%
• 5Y*: -20.32%
• 10Y*: -23.54%

AUCO.L

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: -13.60%
• 6M: -22.26%
• YTD: -12.66%
• 1Y: 49.70%
• 3Y*: 40.27%
• 5Y*: 22.77%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DES2.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	-5.68%	-36.17%	-25.21%	-28.29%	7.83%	-31.54%	-35.25%	-38.99%	36.09%	-28.43%
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF	-12.66%	148.38%	25.74%	11.57%	-8.99%	-3.40%	11.69%	47.39%	-6.21%	-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DES2.L and AUCO.L is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2009	-0.15

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DES2.L and AUCO.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.15 to -0.44, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DES2.L

DES2.L Risk / Return Rank: 6
DES2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
DES2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
DES2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
DES2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
DES2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5

AUCO.L

AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DES2.L	AUCO.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	1.04	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	1.55	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.19	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	1.40	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	3.28	-4.08

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES2.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES2.L and AUCO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES2.L drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than AUCO.L's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES2.L and AUCO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DES2.L	AUCO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.57%	-73.63%	-25.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.84%	-35.39%	+9.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.96%	-35.39%	-31.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.04%	-41.98%	-36.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.66%	-47.20%	-46.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.55%	-34.44%	-65.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.79%	-33.80%	-53.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.11%	15.12%	-3.01%

Volatility

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L) is 9.28%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a volatility of 16.13%. This indicates that DES2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DES2.L	AUCO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.28%	16.13%	-6.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.99%	38.35%	-11.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.03%	47.52%	-15.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.22%	36.94%	-2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.12%	34.05%	+2.07%

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES2.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AUCO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DES2.L vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DES2.L nor AUCO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DES2.L and AUCO.L in my portfolio?

DES2.L and AUCO.L have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DES2.L or AUCO.L?

On fees, AUCO.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DES2.L or AUCO.L?

AUCO.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DES2.L.

What is the main difference between DES2.L and AUCO.L?

DES2.L is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AUCO.L is Gold. DES2.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while AUCO.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DES2.L and 0.55% for AUCO.L.