DES vs. USFR
DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DES is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DES returned 8.17%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. DES charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
DES vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, DES has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 8.17%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.
DES
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
DES vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 16.63% | 0.25% | 9.93% | 16.50% | -10.96% | 26.51% | -4.26% | 20.26% | -12.85% | 8.64% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.58% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DES and USFR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014 | -0.01 |
The correlation between DES and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.01 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DES vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
DES
USFR
DES vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 14.83 | -13.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 48.59 | -45.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 12.58 | -11.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 203.63 | -199.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 767.72 | -757.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 14.83 | -13.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 9.27 | -8.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 3.07 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.60 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
DES vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -1.36% | -64.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -0.02% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -0.06% | -25.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | -0.18% | -24.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.65% | -0.80% | -44.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | 0.00% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -0.16% | -9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 0.01% | +2.67% |
Volatility
DES vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that DES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 0.06% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 0.18% | +10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 0.27% | +16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 0.40% | +19.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 0.81% | +21.16% |
DES vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DES vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.37% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DES and USFR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DES has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 10-year performance, DES leads with 8.17% vs 2.47% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DES has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.37% for DES.
DES is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.83 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DES and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer