PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEO vs. ABEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DEO vs. ABEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diageo plc (DEO) and Ambev S.A. (ABEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEO achieves a -3.40% return, which is significantly lower than ABEV's 24.25% return. Over the past 10 years, DEO has outperformed ABEV with an annualized return of -0.54%, while ABEV has yielded a comparatively lower -2.11% annualized return.


DEO

1D
0.57%
1M
0.87%
6M
-8.31%
YTD
-3.40%
1Y
-17.42%
3Y*
-20.04%
5Y*
-13.37%
10Y*
-0.54%

ABEV

1D
-0.33%
1M
-5.57%
6M
19.41%
YTD
24.25%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
-2.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEO vs. ABEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEO
Diageo plc
-3.40%-29.31%-10.09%-16.28%-17.40%41.72%-3.26%21.39%-0.43%44.13%
ABEV
Ambev S.A.
24.25%45.11%-30.10%8.41%2.38%-4.39%-32.61%21.92%-37.29%35.34%

Correlation

The correlation between DEO and ABEV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 1997

0.27

The correlation between DEO and ABEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DEO:

$45.86B

ABEV:

$47.73B

EPS

DEO:

£9.85

ABEV:

R$0.99

PE Ratio

DEO:

6.26

ABEV:

15.72

PEG Ratio

DEO:

1.80

ABEV:

2.97

PS Ratio

DEO:

0.92

ABEV:

2.78

PB Ratio

DEO:

4.00

ABEV:

2.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

DEO:

£37.37B

ABEV:

R$88.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DEO:

£22.42B

ABEV:

R$45.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

DEO:

£10.72B

ABEV:

R$28.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEO vs. ABEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEO
DEO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ABEV
ABEV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ABEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEO vs. ABEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diageo plc (DEO) and Ambev S.A. (ABEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEOABEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.25

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

2.46

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

5.84

-6.66

DEO vs. ABEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the ABEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEO and ABEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEO vs. ABEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEO drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum ABEV drawdown of -74.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEO and ABEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEOABEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-74.04%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.52%

-16.10%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.07%

-37.59%

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.41%

-38.76%

-24.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.41%

-72.26%

+8.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.92%

-43.81%

-14.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-31.87%

+18.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.25%

6.76%

+14.49%

Volatility

DEO vs. ABEV - Volatility Comparison

Diageo plc (DEO) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Ambev S.A. (ABEV) at 6.63%. This indicates that DEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEOABEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

6.63%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.95%

25.02%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.83%

31.31%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.00%

30.18%

-5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

34.25%

-10.85%

Dividends

DEO vs. ABEV - Dividend Comparison

DEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than ABEV's 5.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEV
Ambev S.A.
5.40%8.10%6.10%5.26%5.36%4.38%2.67%2.51%3.79%2.57%3.41%4.32%
DEO
Diageo plc
4.02%4.80%3.26%2.77%2.16%1.82%2.29%2.07%2.51%2.18%3.00%3.13%

Financials

DEO vs. ABEV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diageo plc and Ambev S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
7.73B
22.46B
(DEO) Total Revenue
(ABEV) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DEO values in GBP, ABEV values in BRL

DEO vs. ABEV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Diageo plc and Ambev S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
61.0%
51.6%
Portfolio components
DEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diageo plc reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 7.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.0%.

ABEV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambev S.A. reported a gross profit of 11.58B and revenue of 22.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.6%.

DEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diageo plc reported an operating income of 2.41B and revenue of 7.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.1%.

ABEV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambev S.A. reported an operating income of 5.87B and revenue of 22.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

DEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Diageo plc reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 7.73B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.

ABEV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambev S.A. reported a net income of 3.77B and revenue of 22.46B, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DEO and ABEV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEO has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to ABEV (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEO dropped -63.41% vs ABEV's -74.04%.

ABEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEO and ABEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer