ABEV vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ABEV or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between ABEV and PG is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ABEV vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ABEV:
-1.09
PG:
0.73
ABEV:
-1.51
PG:
1.09
ABEV:
0.82
PG:
1.15
ABEV:
-0.41
PG:
0.95
ABEV:
-1.73
PG:
3.11
ABEV:
16.61%
PG:
3.59%
ABEV:
26.29%
PG:
15.35%
ABEV:
-74.20%
PG:
-54.23%
ABEV:
-69.51%
PG:
-10.01%
Fundamentals
ABEV:
$34.92B
PG:
$380.86B
ABEV:
$0.15
PG:
$5.82
ABEV:
14.80
PG:
27.79
ABEV:
1.64
PG:
3.41
ABEV:
$62.42B
PG:
$62.46B
ABEV:
$31.33B
PG:
$31.84B
ABEV:
$19.34B
PG:
$16.49B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABEV achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly higher than PG's -3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ABEV has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -8.74%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.00% annualized return.
ABEV
-1.62%
-6.53%
-9.17%
-27.34%
-12.47%
-8.74%
PG
-3.54%
-3.77%
-2.37%
11.39%
7.82%
9.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ABEV vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ABEV
PG
ABEV vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ABEV vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ABEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than PG's 1.87% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambev S.A. | 6.11% | 6.01% | 5.25% | 5.37% | 4.39% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 3.80% | 2.57% | 3.75% | 5.09% | 5.31% |
The Procter & Gamble Company | 1.87% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
ABEV vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEV drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEV and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ABEV vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Ambev S.A. (ABEV) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 4.35%. This indicates that ABEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ABEV vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambev S.A. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities