PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ABEV vs. PG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ABEV and PG is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

ABEV vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1,566.67%
906.67%
ABEV
PG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABEV:

-0.98

PG:

1.32

Sortino Ratio

ABEV:

-1.31

PG:

1.88

Omega Ratio

ABEV:

0.84

PG:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

ABEV:

-0.37

PG:

2.22

Martin Ratio

ABEV:

-1.36

PG:

7.48

Ulcer Index

ABEV:

18.52%

PG:

2.63%

Daily Std Dev

ABEV:

25.54%

PG:

14.91%

Max Drawdown

ABEV:

-74.18%

PG:

-54.23%

Current Drawdown

ABEV:

-67.38%

PG:

-6.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABEV:

$34.92B

PG:

$401.13B

EPS

ABEV:

$0.15

PG:

$5.80

PE Ratio

ABEV:

14.80

PG:

29.37

PEG Ratio

ABEV:

1.92

PG:

3.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABEV:

$82.41B

PG:

$83.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABEV:

$41.27B

PG:

$43.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABEV:

$26.30B

PG:

$22.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEV achieves a -26.43% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 17.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ABEV has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -7.18%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.


ABEV

YTD

-26.43%

1M

-5.07%

6M

-0.96%

1Y

-25.60%

5Y*

-11.73%

10Y*

-7.18%

PG

YTD

17.54%

1M

-1.66%

6M

1.07%

1Y

19.40%

5Y*

8.70%

10Y*

9.10%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABEV vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABEV, currently valued at -0.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.981.32
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABEV, currently valued at -1.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.311.88
The chart of Omega ratio for ABEV, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.841.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABEV, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.372.22
The chart of Martin ratio for ABEV, currently valued at -1.36, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-1.367.48
ABEV
PG

The current ABEV Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the PG Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEV and PG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.98
1.32
ABEV
PG

Dividends

ABEV vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

ABEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, more than PG's 2.36% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ABEV
Ambev S.A.
0.00%5.25%5.37%4.39%2.68%2.51%3.80%2.57%3.75%5.09%5.31%1.64%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.32%2.78%2.91%

Drawdowns

ABEV vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEV drawdown since its inception was -74.18%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEV and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-67.38%
-6.48%
ABEV
PG

Volatility

ABEV vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Ambev S.A. (ABEV) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 4.64%. This indicates that ABEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
11.84%
4.64%
ABEV
PG

Financials

ABEV vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambev S.A. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab