ABEV vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ABEV or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between ABEV and PG is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ABEV vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ABEV:
-0.93
PG:
0.68
ABEV:
-1.24
PG:
1.01
ABEV:
0.85
PG:
1.14
ABEV:
-0.35
PG:
0.88
ABEV:
-1.38
PG:
2.64
ABEV:
17.75%
PG:
3.93%
ABEV:
26.29%
PG:
15.29%
ABEV:
-74.20%
PG:
-54.23%
ABEV:
-69.18%
PG:
-5.06%
Fundamentals
ABEV:
$34.92B
PG:
$397.29B
ABEV:
$0.15
PG:
$6.29
ABEV:
14.80
PG:
26.94
ABEV:
1.63
PG:
3.56
ABEV:
$62.42B
PG:
$84.35B
ABEV:
$31.33B
PG:
$43.30B
ABEV:
$19.34B
PG:
$23.29B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABEV achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ABEV has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -8.28%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.
ABEV
-0.54%
2.79%
-16.09%
-23.36%
-9.40%
-8.28%
PG
1.77%
7.41%
1.67%
11.19%
8.79%
10.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ABEV vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ABEV
PG
ABEV vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambev S.A. (ABEV) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ABEV vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ABEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than PG's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEV Ambev S.A. | 5.89% | 5.86% | 5.25% | 5.37% | 4.39% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 3.80% | 2.57% | 3.75% | 5.09% | 5.31% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.38% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
ABEV vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEV drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEV and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ABEV vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Ambev S.A. (ABEV) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 5.05%. This indicates that ABEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ABEV vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambev S.A. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities