DEMZ vs. SCHX
DEMZ (Democratic Large Cap Core ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DEMZ tracks the Democratic Large Cap Core Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEMZ returned 12.90%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEMZ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
DEMZ vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMZ achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
DEMZ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
DEMZ vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMZ Democratic Large Cap Core ETF | 8.48% | 19.84% | 22.89% | 24.43% | -19.01% | 32.65% | 11.09% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 12.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMZ and SCHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DEMZ and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEMZ vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEMZ
SCHX
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DEMZ
SCHX
Communication Services
DEMZ
SCHX
Industrials
DEMZ
SCHX
Financial Services
DEMZ
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
DEMZ
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
DEMZ
SCHX
Healthcare
DEMZ
SCHX
Real Estate
DEMZ
SCHX
Basic Materials
DEMZ
-
SCHX
Energy
DEMZ
-
SCHX
Utilities
DEMZ
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEMZ vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
DEMZ
SCHX
DEMZ vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEMZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.05 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 13.85 | -6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEMZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.29 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.78 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.85 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
DEMZ vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMZ drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMZ and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -34.33% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -9.02% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -19.04% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -25.41% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.70% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -3.97% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 1.98% | +1.31% |
Volatility
DEMZ vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.91%. This indicates that DEMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEMZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 2.91% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 9.02% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 11.99% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 17.12% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 18.15% | -0.69% |
DEMZ vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMZ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEMZ vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
DEMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMZ Democratic Large Cap Core ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% | 0.53% | 0.90% | 0.98% | 2.46% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DEMZ and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DEMZ has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMZ dropped -27.17% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.29% vs 12.90% for DEMZ. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 12.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DEMZ.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.90% for DEMZ.
DEMZ tracks Democratic Large Cap Core Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Reflection Asset Management, LLC and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DEMZ and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEMZ and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer