DEMZ vs. SCHK

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DEMZ (Democratic Large Cap Core ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DEMZ tracks the Democratic Large Cap Core Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEMZ returned 12.91%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEMZ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.

Performance

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEMZ having a 11.16% return and SCHK slightly lower at 10.97%.

DEMZ

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 7.78%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 1Y: 22.39%
• 3Y*: 20.59%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: —

SCHK

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 9.01%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 1Y: 21.52%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DEMZ Democratic Large Cap Core ETF	11.16%	19.84%	22.89%	24.43%	-19.01%	32.65%	11.27%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	10.97%	17.23%	24.48%	26.63%	-19.51%	26.17%	15.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMZ and SCHK is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2020	0.89

The correlation between DEMZ and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DEMZ	SCHK
Technology	48.2%	38.0%
Communication Services	13.4%	10.1%
Industrials	8.3%	8.9%
Financial Services	8.1%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	9.8%
Healthcare	5.5%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.3%
Real Estate	3.5%	2.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Energy	-	3.2%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

DEMZ vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMZ

DEMZ Risk / Return Rank: 51
DEMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DEMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DEMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DEMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DEMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SCHK

SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 64
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEMZ	SCHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.68	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.33	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.41	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.75	10.52	-3.77

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMZ and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMZ drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMZ and SCHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEMZ	SCHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.17%	-34.80%	+7.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-8.97%	-3.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-19.21%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.17%	-25.44%	-1.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.81%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.00%	-5.13%	-0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	2.05%	+1.28%

Volatility

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) at 3.35%. This indicates that DEMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEMZ	SCHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	3.35%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.91%	10.18%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.75%	12.84%	+1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.96%	17.35%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.45%	19.07%	-1.62%

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMZ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEMZ vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

DEMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DEMZ Democratic Large Cap Core ETF	0.88%	0.98%	0.53%	0.90%	0.98%	2.46%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.20%	1.38%	1.57%	1.17%	1.58%	1.82%	1.80%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEMZ and SCHK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DEMZ and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DEMZ or SCHK?

DEMZ has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to SCHK (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMZ dropped -27.17% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

Which ETF is better, DEMZ or SCHK?

On 5-year performance, DEMZ leads with 12.91% vs 12.59% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEMZ or SCHK?

Over the 5-year period, DEMZ has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEMZ or SCHK?

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DEMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEMZ or SCHK?

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.88% for DEMZ.

What is the main difference between DEMZ and SCHK?

DEMZ tracks Democratic Large Cap Core Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Reflection Asset Management, LLC and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DEMZ and 0.03% for SCHK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.