DEMS.L vs. LDME.L
DEMS.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc) and LDME.L (L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - DEMS.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while LDME.L tracks the L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEMS.L returned 10.54%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for LDME.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEMS.L charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LDME.L.
Performance
DEMS.L vs. LDME.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMS.L achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly higher than LDME.L's 11.94% return.
DEMS.L
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- 6M
- 13.43%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- —
LDME.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
DEMS.L vs. LDME.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMS.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 16.23% | 12.50% | 7.08% | 14.64% | -2.59% | 6.23% |
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 11.94% | 16.54% | 11.33% | 10.64% | -2.34% | 7,358.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMS.L and LDME.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DEMS.L and LDME.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEMS.L vs. LDME.L — Risk / Return Rank
DEMS.L
LDME.L
DEMS.L vs. LDME.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDME.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEMS.L | LDME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.53 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | 9.38 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEMS.L vs. LDME.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMS.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, which is greater than LDME.L's maximum drawdown of -14.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMS.L and LDME.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMS.L | LDME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -14.82% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.44% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | -14.82% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -14.82% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -5.29% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -3.24% | -5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.42% | -0.37% |
Volatility
DEMS.L vs. LDME.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDME.L) have volatilities of 3.92% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEMS.L | LDME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.97% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 9.77% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 12.12% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 12.65% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 3,216.41% | -3,196.48% |
DEMS.L vs. LDME.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMS.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than LDME.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEMS.L vs. LDME.L - Dividend Comparison
DEMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDME.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMS.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 2.85% | 3.04% | 3.67% | 3.56% | 4.57% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEMS.L and LDME.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDME.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDME.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMS.L.
DEMS.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while LDME.L tracks L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for DEMS.L and 0.45% for LDME.L.
Find the right allocation for DEMS.L and LDME.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer