DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L
DEMS.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc) and GGRP.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) are both exchange-traded funds - DEMS.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while GGRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEMS.L returned 10.95%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for GGRP.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DEMS.L charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for GGRP.L.
Performance
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMS.L achieves a 18.95% return, which is significantly higher than GGRP.L's 4.80% return.
DEMS.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 18.95%
- 6M
- 18.43%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
GGRP.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- —
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMS.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 18.95% | 12.50% | 7.08% | 14.64% | -2.59% | 15.41% | -9.66% | 14.70% | -2.61% | 8.70% |
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 4.80% | 7.06% | 9.85% | 11.62% | -3.21% | 20.07% | 13.17% | 29.78% | -5.75% | 13.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMS.L and GGRP.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2017 | 0.43 |
The correlation between DEMS.L and GGRP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Financial Services
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Technology
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Industrials
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Consumer Defensive
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Consumer Cyclical
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Basic Materials
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Communication Services
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Real Estate
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Energy
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Utilities
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Healthcare
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
DEMS.L
GGRP.L
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEMS.L | GGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 1.89 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.97 | 7.20 | +9.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEMS.L | GGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 1.60 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.72 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.90 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMS.L drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than GGRP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMS.L and GGRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMS.L | GGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.57% | -22.60% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -8.59% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | -16.46% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -16.46% | +1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | 0.00% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -2.93% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.26% | -0.44% |
Volatility
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) at 3.00%. This indicates that DEMS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEMS.L | GGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 3.00% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 8.07% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 10.17% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 12.07% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 15.35% | +0.30% |
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMS.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRP.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEMS.L vs. GGRP.L - Dividend Comparison
DEMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMS.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.54% | 1.86% | 2.42% | 1.60% | 1.46% | 1.88% | 2.13% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEMS.L and GGRP.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GGRP.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GGRP.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMS.L.
DEMS.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GGRP.L is Global Equities. DEMS.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while GGRP.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for DEMS.L and 0.38% for GGRP.L.
Find the right allocation for DEMS.L and GGRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer