PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMCX vs. NFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMCX vs. NFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 106.86% return, which is significantly higher than NFFFX's 17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX has outperformed NFFFX with an annualized return of 20.28%, while NFFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.32% annualized return.


DEMCX

1D
2.41%
1M
32.99%
YTD
106.86%
6M
124.60%
1Y
243.29%
3Y*
63.82%
5Y*
24.19%
10Y*
20.28%

NFFFX

1D
0.70%
1M
6.75%
YTD
17.55%
6M
19.27%
1Y
36.61%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMCX vs. NFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
106.86%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%
NFFFX
American Funds New World Fund
17.55%28.52%6.78%16.11%-21.86%4.98%25.17%27.89%-12.08%32.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMCX and NFFFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.87

The correlation between DEMCX and NFFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMCX vs. NFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NFFFX
NFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMCX vs. NFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMCXNFFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.44

2.51

+3.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.38

3.49

+1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.47

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.46

2.84

+8.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

43.69

11.66

+32.04

DEMCX vs. NFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMCX Sharpe Ratio is 6.44, which is higher than the NFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMCX and NFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMCXNFFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44

2.51

+3.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.47

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.70

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Drawdowns

DEMCX vs. NFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, which is greater than NFFFX's maximum drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and NFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMCXNFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.54%

-50.17%

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.11%

-13.01%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-15.05%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.75%

-33.48%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-33.48%

-13.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-9.81%

-9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

3.16%

+2.38%

Volatility

DEMCX vs. NFFFX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) at 5.50%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMCXNFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.12%

5.50%

+11.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.79%

12.51%

+21.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.41%

14.73%

+23.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

15.42%

+9.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.13%

16.14%

+6.99%

DEMCX vs. NFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NFFFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMCX vs. NFFFX - Dividend Comparison

DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.90%, more than NFFFX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
9.90%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%0.00%
NFFFX
American Funds New World Fund
5.11%6.01%4.01%2.78%1.21%7.23%0.35%3.95%2.62%2.17%1.28%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMCX and NFFFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (17.12%) compared to NFFFX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMCX dropped -63.54% vs NFFFX's -50.17%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.44 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMCX and NFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer