DEM vs. QAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) and QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - DEM tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index while QAT tracks the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEM returned 10.52%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for QAT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DEM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QAT.

Performance

DEM vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEM achieves a 18.12% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DEM has outperformed QAT with an annualized return of 10.52%, while QAT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.

DEM

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 1.59%
• YTD: 18.12%
• 6M: 18.38%
• 1Y: 28.27%
• 3Y*: 18.30%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: 10.52%

QAT

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: 5.84%
• 5Y*: 3.56%
• 10Y*: 4.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEM vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund	18.12%	21.29%	4.46%	20.93%	-10.43%	11.49%	-5.84%	19.84%	-7.69%	26.26%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	1.01%	8.81%	5.20%	2.72%	-7.23%	14.42%	6.94%	-0.44%	20.03%	-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DEM and QAT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014	0.34

DEM vs. QAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DEM	QAT
Financial Services	21.9%	55.5%
Technology	17.4%	1.0%
Industrials	9.5%	8.4%
Energy	6.1%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	0.7%
Basic Materials	3.5%	12.6%
Real Estate	3.0%	4.0%
Utilities	3.0%	2.5%
Communication Services	3.0%	6.3%
Healthcare	0.6%	0.8%

Return for Risk

DEM vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEM

DEM Risk / Return Rank: 66
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

QAT

QAT Risk / Return Rank: 17
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEM vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEM	QAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	0.54	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	0.87	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.11	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	0.67	+2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.31	1.24	+11.07

DEM vs. QAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the QAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEM and QAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEM vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than QAT's maximum drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and QAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEM	QAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.85%	-45.21%	-6.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-10.60%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.64%	-17.41%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.18%	-33.17%	+5.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.79%	-34.04%	-3.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.71%	-11.55%	+8.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-19.14%	+6.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	5.75%	-3.45%

Volatility

DEM vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) at 5.72%. This indicates that DEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEM	QAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.28%	5.72%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	11.06%	+1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	13.25%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.49%	15.06%	+0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.87%	17.54%	+0.33%

DEM vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEM vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than QAT's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund	3.82%	4.88%	5.24%	5.49%	8.62%	5.87%	4.21%	4.78%	4.47%	3.67%	3.63%	5.21%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	4.63%	3.51%	5.90%	3.92%	4.78%	2.33%	2.63%	3.57%	4.63%	4.10%	3.51%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEM and QAT in my portfolio?

DEM and QAT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEM or QAT?

DEM has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to QAT (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEM dropped -51.85% vs QAT's -45.21%.

Which ETF is better, DEM or QAT?

On 10-year performance, DEM leads with 10.52% vs 4.43% for QAT. On fees, QAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, QAT has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEM or QAT?

Over the 10-year period, DEM has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEM or QAT?

QAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEM or QAT?

QAT has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 3.82% for DEM.

What is the main difference between DEM and QAT?

DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index, while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DEM and 0.59% for QAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.