DEM vs. LVHI
DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - DEM tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index while LVHI tracks the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEM returned 9.13%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for LVHI. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DEM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
DEM vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEM having a 18.54% return and LVHI slightly lower at 17.87%. Over the past 10 years, DEM has underperformed LVHI with an annualized return of 9.13%, while LVHI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return.
DEM
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.99%
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 33.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.83M | $15.09M | $12.97M | |
| $36.71M | $31.16M | $26.95M |
DEM vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 18.54% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -10.43% | 11.49% | -5.84% | 19.84% | -7.69% | 26.26% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 17.87% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEM and LVHI is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.53 |
The correlation between DEM and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEM vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEM
LVHI
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
DEM
LVHI
Technology
DEM
LVHI
Industrials
DEM
LVHI
Energy
DEM
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
DEM
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
DEM
LVHI
Basic Materials
DEM
LVHI
Utilities
DEM
LVHI
Communication Services
DEM
LVHI
Real Estate
DEM
LVHI
Healthcare
DEM
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEM vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
DEM
LVHI
DEM vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEM | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.71 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 5.61 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 23.36 | -13.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEM vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEM | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.85% | -32.31% | -19.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -6.08% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -11.99% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.18% | -11.99% | -15.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.79% | -32.31% | -5.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -1.05% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.81% | -3.47% | -9.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.45% | +1.17% |
Volatility
DEM vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.10%. This indicates that DEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEM | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 2.10% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 7.52% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 9.30% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 11.06% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 13.69% | +4.17% |
DEM vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEM vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than LVHI's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.13% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.52% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEM and LVHI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEM has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to LVHI (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEM dropped -51.85% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 10-year performance, LVHI leads with 11.77% vs 9.13% for DEM. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 4.13% for DEM.
DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DEM and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEM and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer