DEM vs. EEMD
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD).
DEM and EEMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEM is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2007. EEMD is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. It was launched on Nov 28, 2017. Both DEM and EEMD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DEM vs. EEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DEM vs. EEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 6.89% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -10.43% | 11.49% | -5.84% | 19.84% | -7.69% | 5.09% |
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.61% | 17.60% | -11.21% | 5.54% | -0.35% | 12.55% | -14.57% | 5.00% |
Returns By Period
DEM
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 23.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.12%
EEMD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEM vs. EEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DEM vs. EEMD — Risk / Return Rank
DEM
EEMD
DEM vs. EEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEM | EEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEM | EEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between DEM and EEMD is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DEM vs. EEMD - Dividend Comparison
DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, while EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.22% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% | 8.41% | 7.66% | 6.34% | 3.84% | 5.35% | 4.91% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DEM vs. EEMD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEM | EEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility
DEM vs. EEMD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DEM | EEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | — | — |