PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEHP vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEHP vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEHP achieves a 35.45% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.


DEHP

1D
-1.18%
1M
10.85%
YTD
35.45%
6M
39.02%
1Y
66.88%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
10Y*

UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEHP vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DEHP
Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF
35.45%32.86%4.47%12.31%-9.73%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DEHP and UEVM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.86

The correlation between DEHP and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEHP vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEHP
UEVM

Technology

41.3%
15.5%

Communication Services

11.4%
2.0%

Industrials

11.4%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
5.0%

Basic Materials

7.7%
4.6%

Financial Services

6.5%
17.7%

Energy

5.0%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
5.5%

Healthcare

2.5%
4.4%

Utilities

0.6%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.4%
2.8%

Technology

DEHP
41.3%
UEVM
15.5%

Communication Services

DEHP
11.4%
UEVM
2.0%

Industrials

DEHP
11.4%
UEVM
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DEHP
9.0%
UEVM
5.0%

Basic Materials

DEHP
7.7%
UEVM
4.6%

Financial Services

DEHP
6.5%
UEVM
17.7%

Energy

DEHP
5.0%
UEVM
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

DEHP
4.3%
UEVM
5.5%

Healthcare

DEHP
2.5%
UEVM
4.4%

Utilities

DEHP
0.6%
UEVM
4.1%

Real Estate

DEHP
0.4%
UEVM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEHP vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEHP
DEHP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DEHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEHP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DEHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEHP vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEHPUEVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.30

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

2.56

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.55

8.65

+11.90

DEHP vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEHP Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEHP and UEVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEHPUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

1.65

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.33

+0.59

Drawdowns

DEHP vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEHP drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEHP and UEVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEHPUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-45.44%

+22.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-9.79%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-18.88%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-2.18%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-11.67%

+5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.89%

+0.37%

Volatility

DEHP vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) has a higher volatility of 9.93% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.15%. This indicates that DEHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEHPUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.93%

5.15%

+4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.56%

12.13%

+6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.97%

15.18%

+5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

15.90%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.39%

+0.23%

DEHP vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEHP has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEHP vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

DEHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEHP
Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF
1.32%1.73%2.44%2.84%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEHP and UEVM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEHP has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEHP dropped -22.90% vs UEVM's -45.44%.

On 3-year performance, DEHP leads with 25.54% vs 18.34% for UEVM. On fees, DEHP is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DEHP has performed better with a 25.54% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEHP is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.32% for DEHP.

DEHP is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DEHP and 0.45% for UEVM.

DEHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEHP and UEVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer