DEHP vs. BBEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DEHP (Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF) and BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. DEHP is actively managed, while BBEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DEHP returned 25.54%/yr vs 23.00%/yr for BBEM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DEHP charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBEM.

Performance

DEHP vs. BBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEHP achieves a 35.45% return, which is significantly higher than BBEM's 27.02% return.

DEHP

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 10.85%
• YTD: 35.45%
• 6M: 39.02%
• 1Y: 66.88%
• 3Y*: 25.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBEM

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 9.46%
• YTD: 27.02%
• 6M: 29.37%
• 1Y: 53.50%
• 3Y*: 23.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEHP vs. BBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DEHP Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF	35.45%	32.86%	4.47%	7.84%
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	27.02%	32.43%	5.61%	6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DEHP and BBEM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.96

The correlation between DEHP and BBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEHP vs. BBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DEHP	BBEM
Technology	41.3%	36.5%
Communication Services	11.4%	6.7%
Industrials	11.4%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	10.0%
Basic Materials	7.7%	6.2%
Financial Services	6.5%	19.0%
Energy	5.0%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	3.0%
Healthcare	2.5%	2.8%
Utilities	0.6%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.0%

Return for Risk

DEHP vs. BBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEHP

DEHP Risk / Return Rank: 89
DEHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DEHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DEHP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DEHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DEHP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BBEM

BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 82
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEHP vs. BBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEHP	BBEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.21	2.76	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	3.64	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.51	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.11	4.10	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.55	16.16	+4.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEHP vs. BBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEHP Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is comparable to the BBEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEHP and BBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEHP	BBEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21	2.76	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.32	-0.40

Drawdowns

DEHP vs. BBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEHP drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than BBEM's maximum drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEHP and BBEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEHP	BBEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.90%	-17.42%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.16%	-13.12%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-17.42%	-1.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-1.31%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-3.70%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	3.32%	-0.06%

Volatility

DEHP vs. BBEM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) has a higher volatility of 9.93% compared to JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) at 8.59%. This indicates that DEHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEHP	BBEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.93%	8.59%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.56%	17.20%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.97%	19.49%	+1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.62%	17.50%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	17.50%	+1.12%

DEHP vs. BBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEHP has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEHP vs. BBEM - Dividend Comparison

DEHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than BBEM's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	4.59%	5.86%	2.73%	1.94%	0.00%
DEHP Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF	1.32%	1.73%	2.44%	2.84%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEHP and BBEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, DEHP and BBEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DEHP or BBEM?

DEHP has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to BBEM (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEHP dropped -22.90% vs BBEM's -17.42%.

Which ETF is better, DEHP or BBEM?

On 3-year performance, DEHP leads with 25.54% vs 23.00% for BBEM. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEHP or BBEM?

Over the 3-year period, DEHP has performed better with a 25.54% return vs 23.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEHP or BBEM?

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DEHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEHP or BBEM?

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.32% for DEHP.

What is the main difference between DEHP and BBEM?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DEHP and 0.15% for BBEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.