DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE
DEGC.DE (Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDEB.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds. DEGC.DE is actively managed, while XDEB.DE is passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DEGC.DE charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.DE.
Performance
DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEGC.DE achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return.
DEGC.DE
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEB.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 0.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DEGC.DE Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.44% | 2.00% |
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.74% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEGC.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DEGC.DE
XDEB.DE
DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DEGC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEGC.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.82 | 0.70 | +2.12 |
Drawdowns
DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEGC.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum XDEB.DE drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEGC.DE and XDEB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEGC.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -28.57% | +23.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.53% | +6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -5.03% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility
DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEGC.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.55% | 7.86% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 10.16% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 12.03% | -2.48% |
DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEGC.DE has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DEGC.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DEGC.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DEGC.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DEGC.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DEGC.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.
Find the right allocation for DEGC.DE and XDEB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer