DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE
DEGC.DE (Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and UETW.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both Global Equities funds. DEGC.DE is actively managed, while UETW.DE is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEGC.DE charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for UETW.DE.
Performance
DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEGC.DE having a 11.44% return and UETW.DE slightly lower at 10.95%.
DEGC.DE
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UETW.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- —
DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DEGC.DE Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.44% | 2.00% |
UETW.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 10.95% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEGC.DE and UETW.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DEGC.DE
UETW.DE
DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DEGC.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEGC.DE | UETW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.82 | 0.85 | +1.97 |
Drawdowns
DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEGC.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum UETW.DE drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEGC.DE and UETW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEGC.DE | UETW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -33.72% | +28.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.30% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -4.63% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEGC.DE | UETW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.55% | 10.97% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 14.03% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 16.11% | -6.56% |
DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEGC.DE has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than UETW.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DEGC.DE vs. UETW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DEGC.DE nor UETW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DEGC.DE and UETW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UETW.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UETW.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DEGC.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DEGC.DE and 0.10% for UETW.DE.
Find the right allocation for DEGC.DE and UETW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer