DEFR vs. BPH
DEFR (Aptus Deferred Income ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEFR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Aptus, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. DEFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
DEFR vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DEFR
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEFR vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DEFR Aptus Deferred Income ETF | 0.51% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | -5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEFR and BPH is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEFR vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
DEFR
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DEFR vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEFR | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEFR vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEFR drawdown since its inception was -3.90%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEFR and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEFR | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -9.43% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -8.21% | +5.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -2.89% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | — | — |
Volatility
DEFR vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEFR | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.18% | 24.73% | -19.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 24.73% | -19.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 24.73% | -19.38% |
DEFR vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEFR vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
DEFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.53% |
DEFR Aptus Deferred Income ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEFR and BPH have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DEFR.
BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for DEFR.
DEFR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DEFR and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for DEFR and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer