DEFR vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DEFR (Aptus Deferred Income ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEFR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Aptus, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. DEFR is actively managed, while BCI is passively managed. Over the past year, DEFR returned 4.53% vs 23.00% for BCI. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. DEFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.

Performance

DEFR vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEFR achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 13.01% return.

DEFR

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: -0.15%
• 6M: -0.30%
• 1Y: 4.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -11.54%
• YTD: 13.01%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: 23.00%
• 3Y*: 10.67%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEFR vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DEFR Aptus Deferred Income ETF	-0.15%	6.80%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.01%	8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DEFR and BCI is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

DEFR vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEFR

DEFR Risk / Return Rank: 25
DEFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
DEFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DEFR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
DEFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DEFR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 40
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEFR vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEFR	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.35	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.84	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	1.56	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.96	6.68	-3.73

DEFR vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEFR and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEFR vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEFR drawdown since its inception was -3.90%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEFR and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEFR	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-32.69%	+28.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.90%	-14.82%	+10.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-14.82%	+12.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.02%	-11.99%	+10.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	3.45%	-1.91%

Volatility

DEFR vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) is 1.61%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that DEFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEFR	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	3.84%	-2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.50%	15.11%	-11.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.17%	17.19%	-12.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.34%	16.82%	-11.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.34%	15.66%	-10.32%

DEFR vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEFR vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

DEFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.59%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
DEFR Aptus Deferred Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEFR and BCI in my portfolio?

DEFR and BCI have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEFR or BCI?

BCI has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to DEFR (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEFR dropped -3.90% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, DEFR or BCI?

On 1-year performance, BCI leads with 23.00% vs 4.53% for DEFR. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DEFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEFR or BCI?

Over the 1-year period, BCI has performed better with a 23.00% return vs 4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEFR or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DEFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEFR or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.59%, compared with 0.00% for DEFR.

What is the main difference between DEFR and BCI?

DEFR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DEFR and 0.26% for BCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.