DEF vs. VV
DEF (Invesco Defensive Equity ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DEF tracks the Invesco Defensive Equity Index while VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEF returned 10.28%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for VV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEF charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
DEF vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEF achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DEF has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 10.28%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
DEF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
VV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
DEF vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | -2.29% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -3.96% | 21.52% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.69% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEF and VV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2006 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DEF and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DEF vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEF
VV
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
DEF
VV
Financial Services
DEF
VV
Industrials
DEF
VV
Consumer Defensive
DEF
VV
Technology
DEF
VV
Consumer Cyclical
DEF
VV
Utilities
DEF
VV
Communication Services
DEF
VV
Real Estate
DEF
VV
Basic Materials
DEF
VV
Energy
DEF
VV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEF vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
DEF
VV
DEF vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEF | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.42 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 3.03 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 13.86 | -12.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEF | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 2.33 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.79 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.86 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
DEF vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEF drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEF and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEF | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -54.81% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -9.21% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -18.97% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -25.66% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | -34.28% | -2.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | -0.72% | -5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -6.84% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 2.01% | +1.58% |
Volatility
DEF vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.84%. This indicates that DEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEF | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.84% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 8.98% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 11.99% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 17.22% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 18.19% | -2.14% |
DEF vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEF vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
DEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | 0.96% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEF and VV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEF has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEF dropped -47.91% vs VV's -54.81%.
On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.58% vs 10.28% for DEF. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.
VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.96% for DEF.
DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.04% for VV.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEF and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer