PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEP vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEEP vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DEEP has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 8.15%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.


DEEP

1D
-2.02%
1M
0.72%
YTD
12.39%
6M
11.91%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
8.15%

VBR

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.39%
YTD
11.67%
6M
11.95%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
12.39%5.69%-2.97%22.37%-17.71%35.66%-9.96%12.54%-7.17%27.19%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.67%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and VBR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2014

0.86

The correlation between DEEP and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEEP vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEEP
VBR

Industrials

25.8%
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
4.0%

Financial Services

8.6%
17.6%

Technology

8.5%
10.6%

Healthcare

6.6%
7.9%

Energy

5.7%
5.2%

Basic Materials

4.8%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.5%

Real Estate

3.1%
10.1%

Utilities

-

4.8%

Industrials

DEEP
25.8%
VBR
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DEEP
25.5%
VBR
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

DEEP
10.5%
VBR
4.0%

Financial Services

DEEP
8.6%
VBR
17.6%

Technology

DEEP
8.5%
VBR
10.6%

Healthcare

DEEP
6.6%
VBR
7.9%

Energy

DEEP
5.7%
VBR
5.2%

Basic Materials

DEEP
4.8%
VBR
6.3%

Communication Services

DEEP
4.1%
VBR
2.5%

Real Estate

DEEP
3.1%
VBR
10.1%

Utilities

DEEP

-

VBR
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEEP vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP
DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEPVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.93

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

10.32

-3.56

DEEP vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEPVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.71

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.40

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.49

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.42

-0.12

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEPVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.52%

-61.98%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-8.85%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

-24.19%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.40%

-24.19%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.52%

-45.28%

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-0.39%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-8.27%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

2.50%

+1.62%

Volatility

DEEP vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.96%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEPVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

3.96%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

10.46%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

15.17%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

19.77%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

21.73%

+2.54%

DEEP vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEEP vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than VBR's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
1.52%1.78%1.96%1.67%1.28%1.43%4.03%3.49%1.51%2.01%3.14%3.98%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEEP and VBR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEEP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to VBR (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.53% vs 8.15% for DEEP. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.52% for DEEP.

DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEP and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer