DEEP vs. HYLD
DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and HYLD (High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while HYLD is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. DEEP is passively managed, while HYLD is actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for HYLD.
Performance
DEEP vs. HYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DEEP
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 31.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
HYLD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEEP vs. HYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 17.68% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 22.37% | -17.71% | 35.66% | -9.96% | 12.54% | -7.17% | 27.19% |
HYLD High Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.80% | -11.48% | 5.41% | 3.11% | 7.16% | 0.25% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and HYLD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014 | 0.26 |
The correlation between DEEP and HYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. HYLD — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
HYLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DEEP vs. HYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEEP | HYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. HYLD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | HYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | — | — |
Volatility
DEEP vs. HYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | HYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | — | — |
DEEP vs. HYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEEP vs. HYLD - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
HYLD High Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.67% | 7.86% | 6.45% | 7.52% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 7.18% | 6.59% | 10.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEP and HYLD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEEP is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEEP is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.
DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for HYLD.
DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while HYLD is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 1.29% for HYLD.
Find the right allocation for DEEP and HYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer