DEEP vs. FYT
DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - DEEP tracks the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index while FYT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEEP returned 8.23%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for FYT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for FYT.
Performance
DEEP vs. FYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 22.08% return, which is significantly lower than FYT's 28.49% return. Over the past 10 years, DEEP has underperformed FYT with an annualized return of 8.23%, while FYT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.
DEEP
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 1Y
- 32.52%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
FYT
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- YTD
- 28.49%
- 1Y
- 42.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
DEEP vs. FYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 22.08% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 22.37% | -17.71% | 35.66% | -9.96% | 12.54% | -7.17% | 27.19% |
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 28.49% | 4.00% | 3.24% | 22.90% | -14.05% | 29.33% | 9.82% | 25.80% | -14.73% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and FYT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DEEP and FYT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEEP vs. FYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEEP
FYT
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
DEEP
FYT
Industrials
DEEP
FYT
Consumer Defensive
DEEP
FYT
Financial Services
DEEP
FYT
Technology
DEEP
FYT
Healthcare
DEEP
FYT
Energy
DEEP
FYT
Basic Materials
DEEP
FYT
Communication Services
DEEP
FYT
Real Estate
DEEP
FYT
Utilities
DEEP
-
FYT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. FYT — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
FYT
DEEP vs. FYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEEP | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 5.13 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 14.78 | -6.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. FYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FYT drawdown of -50.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and FYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -50.48% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -8.34% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -28.90% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | -28.90% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | -50.48% | -2.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -8.48% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 2.89% | +1.18% |
Volatility
DEEP vs. FYT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) is 3.79%, while First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that DEEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 4.45% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.36% | 11.64% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 18.28% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 22.49% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 25.88% | -1.70% |
DEEP vs. FYT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FYT's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEEP vs. FYT - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than FYT's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.87% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.42% | 0.94% | 2.07% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.78% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEP and FYT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FYT has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DEEP (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs FYT's -50.48%.
On 10-year performance, FYT leads with 10.77% vs 8.23% for DEEP. On fees, FYT is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, DEEP has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYT has performed better with a 10.77% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYT is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.
DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.42% for FYT.
DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.72% for FYT.
FYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEEP and FYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer