DEEP vs. EPSV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and EPSV (Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. DEEP is passively managed, while EPSV is actively managed. Over the past year, DEEP returned 27.76% vs 46.19% for EPSV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPSV.

Performance

DEEP vs. EPSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than EPSV's 26.42% return.

DEEP

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 11.91%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: 8.15%

EPSV

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 7.26%
• YTD: 26.42%
• 6M: 26.98%
• 1Y: 46.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. EPSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	12.39%	20.17%
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	26.42%	20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and EPSV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025	0.79

The correlation between DEEP and EPSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEEP vs. EPSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DEEP	EPSV
Industrials	25.8%	24.9%
Consumer Cyclical	25.5%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	10.5%	5.0%
Financial Services	8.6%	19.1%
Technology	8.5%	22.7%
Healthcare	6.6%	0.9%
Energy	5.7%	6.1%
Basic Materials	4.8%	4.3%
Communication Services	4.1%	-
Real Estate	3.1%	7.5%
Utilities	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

DEEP vs. EPSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP

DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 42
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

EPSV

EPSV Risk / Return Rank: 83
EPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. EPSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEEP	EPSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.62	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.68	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.46	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	5.19	-2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	18.03	-11.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEEP vs. EPSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the EPSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and EPSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEEP	EPSV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	2.62	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	2.66	-2.37

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. EPSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than EPSV's maximum drawdown of -8.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and EPSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEEP	EPSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.52%	-8.93%	-43.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	-8.93%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-0.04%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.40%	-1.67%	-8.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	2.57%	+1.55%

Volatility

DEEP vs. EPSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) is 5.67%, while Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that DEEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEEP	EPSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	6.05%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.29%	12.80%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	17.75%	+1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	18.14%	+3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.27%	18.14%	+6.13%

DEEP vs. EPSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSV's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEEP vs. EPSV - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than EPSV's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	1.52%	1.78%	1.96%	1.67%	1.28%	1.43%	4.03%	3.49%	1.51%	2.01%	3.14%	3.98%
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	2.28%	2.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEEP and EPSV in my portfolio?

DEEP and EPSV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEEP or EPSV?

EPSV has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to DEEP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs EPSV's -8.93%.

Which ETF is better, DEEP or EPSV?

On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 46.19% vs 27.76% for DEEP. On fees, DEEP is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, DEEP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEEP or EPSV?

Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 46.19% return vs 27.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEEP or EPSV?

DEEP is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEEP or EPSV?

EPSV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.52% for DEEP.

What is the main difference between DEEP and EPSV?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.88% for EPSV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.