DEEF vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DEEF (Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. DEEF is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, DEEF returned 20.22% vs 5.27% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. DEEF charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

DEEF vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEF achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.44% return.

DEEF

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -2.58%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 7.52%
• 1Y: 20.22%
• 3Y*: 16.83%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 8.60%

ACLO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.44%
• 6M: 2.55%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEF vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF	7.53%	32.36%	-0.90%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.44%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEF and ACLO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	-0.08

Return for Risk

DEEF vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEF

DEEF Risk / Return Rank: 43
DEEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DEEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DEEF Omega Ratio Rank: 45
DEEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
DEEF Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEF vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEEF	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	7.28	-5.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	15.06	-13.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	3.42	-2.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	19.77	-17.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.31	164.39	-158.08

DEEF vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEF and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEEF vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEF drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEF and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEEF	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.48%	-1.01%	-35.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.64%	-0.27%	-10.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.00%	0.00%	-6.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.08%	-0.04%	-7.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	0.03%	+3.18%

Volatility

DEEF vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that DEEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEEF	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	0.19%	+3.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	0.58%	+11.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.88%	0.73%	+13.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.98%	1.07%	+13.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.04%	1.07%	+14.97%

DEEF vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DEEF vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than ACLO's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.90%	4.87%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF	3.53%	3.63%	4.04%	3.96%	3.31%	3.84%	2.71%	3.74%	2.80%	2.61%	4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEEF and ACLO in my portfolio?

DEEF and ACLO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEEF or ACLO?

DEEF has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEF dropped -36.48% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, DEEF or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, DEEF leads with 20.22% vs 5.27% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEEF or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, DEEF has performed better with a 20.22% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEEF or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DEEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEEF or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.53% for DEEF.

What is the main difference between DEEF and ACLO?

DEEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DEEF and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.28 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.