PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEED vs. JMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEED vs. JMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEED achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than JMBS's 0.51% return.


DEED

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.49%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*

JMBS

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.73%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEED vs. JMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DEED
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF
0.32%8.91%3.19%6.43%-16.03%1.62%4.71%
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.51%8.82%1.53%5.66%-11.40%-0.32%3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DEED and JMBS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.77

The correlation between DEED and JMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEED vs. JMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEED
DEED Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEED Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEED Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBS
JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEED vs. JMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEDJMBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.67

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.49

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.36

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.79

7.80

-2.01

DEED vs. JMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEED Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the JMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEED and JMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEDJMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.67

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.11

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.42

-0.22

Drawdowns

DEED vs. JMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEED drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, which is greater than JMBS's maximum drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEED and JMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEDJMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-16.68%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-3.05%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.50%

-7.76%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.96%

-16.68%

-3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-1.66%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-3.90%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

0.92%

+0.21%

Volatility

DEED vs. JMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF (DEED) is 1.10%, while Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that DEED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEDJMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.65%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

3.23%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

4.31%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

6.49%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.97%

5.52%

+0.45%

DEED vs. JMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEED has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JMBS's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEED vs. JMBS - Dividend Comparison

DEED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than JMBS's 5.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DEED
First Trust TCW Securitized Plus ETF
4.28%4.10%5.73%5.59%2.43%1.93%1.60%0.00%0.00%
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.19%5.03%5.53%4.38%2.73%1.16%2.92%3.63%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEED and JMBS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMBS has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to DEED (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEED dropped -19.96% vs JMBS's -16.68%.

On 5-year performance, JMBS leads with 0.74% vs 0.21% for DEED. On fees, JMBS is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DEED has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMBS has performed better with a 0.74% return vs 0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMBS is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DEED.

JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 4.28% for DEED.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DEED and 0.32% for JMBS.

JMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEED and JMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer