DECZ vs. NVDO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DECZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DECZ is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DECZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

DECZ vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECZ achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.

DECZ

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 6M: 8.12%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: —

NVDO

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 29.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECZ vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF	8.14%	4.72%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	18.85%	11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DECZ and NVDO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

DECZ vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECZ

DECZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
DECZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DECZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
DECZ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DECZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
DECZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECZ vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DECZ	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.35	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DECZ	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.30	-0.30

Drawdowns

DECZ vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECZ drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECZ and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECZ	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.57%	-16.25%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-2.68%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-4.99%	+1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DECZ	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.57%	31.93%	-22.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.59%	31.93%	-19.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.39%	31.93%	-19.54%

DECZ vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

DECZ vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than NVDO's 14.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF	3.03%	3.28%	2.55%	1.23%	1.44%	0.46%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.02%	16.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECZ and NVDO in my portfolio?

DECZ and NVDO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DECZ or NVDO?

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DECZ or NVDO?

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DECZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DECZ or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 3.03% for DECZ.

What is the main difference between DECZ and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DECZ and 0.77% for NVDO.