PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECU vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECU vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECU achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.


DECU

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.70%
6M
5.34%
YTD
6.80%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBIT

1D
5.38%
1M
1.44%
6M
58.27%
YTD
44.00%
1Y
124.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECU vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DECU
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF
6.80%11.52%-2.03%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
44.00%-25.11%2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DECU and SBIT is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECU vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECU
DECU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECU vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECUSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.60

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

5.92

+2.72

DECU vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECU Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECU and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECU vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECUSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-91.35%

+80.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-47.94%

+42.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-77.15%

+75.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-68.83%

+67.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

21.04%

-19.38%

Volatility

DECU vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) is 3.73%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that DECU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECUSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

22.98%

-19.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

68.89%

-61.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.67%

88.51%

-78.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

96.89%

-86.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.80%

96.89%

-86.09%

DECU vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECU vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

DECU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.


PositionTTM20252024
DECU
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.97%0.52%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DECU and SBIT have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to DECU (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 14.31% for DECU. On fees, DECU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, DECU has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 14.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for DECU.

DECU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DECU and 0.95% for SBIT.

DECU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECU and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer