PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECU vs. KAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECU vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECU achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 12.34% return.


DECU

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
5.22%
6M
4.88%
1Y
15.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KAPR

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.73%
YTD
12.34%
6M
12.09%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECU vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DECU and KAPR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024

0.79

The correlation between DECU and KAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECU vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECU
DECU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECU vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECUKAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.73

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

9.30

-6.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.74

43.60

-33.86

DECU vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECU Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECU and KAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECU vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and KAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECUKAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-16.91%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-2.52%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.37%

-2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-3.89%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.54%

+1.05%

Volatility

DECU vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) at 2.53%. This indicates that DECU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECUKAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

2.53%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

4.57%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.47%

6.70%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.79%

11.76%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.79%

11.65%

-0.86%

DECU vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECU vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECU nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DECU and KAPR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECU has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to KAPR (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs KAPR's -16.91%.

On 1-year performance, KAPR leads with 23.29% vs 15.48% for DECU. On fees, DECU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, KAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KAPR has performed better with a 23.29% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAPR.

DECU and KAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DECU and 0.79% for KAPR.

KAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECU and KAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer