DECU vs. AUGT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DECU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF) and AUGT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DECU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while AUGT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DECU returned 15.55% vs 16.51% for AUGT. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

DECU vs. AUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECU achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than AUGT's 8.95% return.

DECU

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 1.26%
• 6M: 6.33%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 1Y: 15.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.17%

AUGT

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 1.91%
• 6M: 7.62%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 1Y: 16.51%
• 3Y*: 16.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF	$375.41K	$191.67K	$205.84K
DECU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF	$211.45K	$142.94K	$292.77K

DECU vs. AUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DECU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF	7.58%	11.52%	-2.03%
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF	8.95%	14.64%	-1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DECU and AUGT is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024	0.93

The correlation between DECU and AUGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DECU vs. AUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DECU

DECU Risk / Return Rank: 63
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 58
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 68

AUGT

AUGT Risk / Return Rank: 88
AUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
AUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DECU vs. AUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DECU	AUGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.31	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	3.32	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.46	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	3.09	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	16.06	-7.05

DECU vs. AUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECU Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the AUGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECU and AUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DECU vs. AUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum AUGT drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and AUGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECU	AUGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.66%	-13.12%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.65%	-5.36%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	0.00%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.74%	-1.18%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.03%	+0.70%

Volatility

DECU vs. AUGT - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) at 1.27%. This indicates that DECU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DECU	AUGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	1.27%	+1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.51%	5.47%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	7.19%	+2.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.82%	9.98%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.82%	9.98%	+0.84%

DECU vs. AUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DECU and AUGT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

DECU vs. AUGT - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECU nor AUGT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECU and AUGT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DECU and AUGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DECU or AUGT?

DECU has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to AUGT (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs AUGT's -13.12%.

Which ETF is better, DECU or AUGT?

On 1-year performance, AUGT leads with 16.51% vs 15.55% for DECU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, AUGT has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DECU or AUGT?

Over the 1-year period, AUGT has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DECU or AUGT?

DECU and AUGT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DECU or AUGT?

DECU and AUGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DECU and AUGT?

DECU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AUGT is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.