PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECU vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECU vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DECU having a 7.58% return and APRW slightly lower at 7.39%.


DECU

1D
1.11%
1M
1.26%
6M
6.33%
YTD
7.58%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.17%

APRW

1D
0.23%
1M
0.84%
6M
6.80%
YTD
7.39%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$162.31K$917.50K$612.20K
$211.45K$142.94K$292.77K

DECU vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DECU
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF
7.58%11.52%-2.03%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
7.39%6.18%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DECU and APRW is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024

0.88

The correlation between DECU and APRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECU vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DECU
DECU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DECU vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECUAPRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

2.01

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

13.03

-10.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

64.11

-55.09

DECU vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECU Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 4.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECU and APRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECU vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, which is greater than APRW's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and APRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECUAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-9.61%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-0.89%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-1.10%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

0.18%

+1.55%

Volatility

DECU vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 0.97%. This indicates that DECU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECUAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

0.97%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

2.30%

+5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.91%

2.78%

+7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.82%

6.73%

+4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.82%

6.35%

+4.47%

DECU vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DECU and APRW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

DECU vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECU nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%
DECU
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DECU and APRW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECU has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to APRW (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs APRW's -9.61%.

On 1-year performance, DECU leads with 15.55% vs 11.59% for APRW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, APRW has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DECU has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECU and APRW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

DECU and APRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DECU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while APRW is Options Trading.

APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.19 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECU and APRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer