DECT vs. ARLU
DECT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF) and ARLU (Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DECT returned 21.15% vs 19.35% for ARLU. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.
Performance
DECT vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DECT achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than ARLU's 6.41% return.
DECT
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARLU
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DECT vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DECT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF | 7.16% | 15.04% | 5.90% |
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF | 6.41% | 11.27% | 9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECT and ARLU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DECT and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECT vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank
DECT
ARLU
DECT vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DECT | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.32 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.01 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.66 | 9.00 | +7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DECT | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 1.75 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 1.00 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
DECT vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECT drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECT and ARLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECT | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -15.38% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.11% | -9.66% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.53% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -2.23% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 2.15% | -0.88% |
Volatility
DECT vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) is 1.65%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that DECT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECT | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 2.63% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.34% | 8.73% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.68% | 11.13% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 12.56% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 12.56% | -2.33% |
DECT vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DECT and ARLU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Dividends
DECT vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison
Neither DECT nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DECT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DECT and ARLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ARLU has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to DECT (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECT dropped -13.26% vs ARLU's -15.38%.
On 1-year performance, DECT leads with 21.15% vs 19.35% for ARLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, DECT has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DECT has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 19.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DECT and ARLU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.
DECT and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DECT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DECT and ARLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer