PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECT vs. ARLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECT vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECT achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than ARLU's 6.41% return.


DECT

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.06%
YTD
7.16%
6M
7.61%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
10Y*

ARLU

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.52%
YTD
6.41%
6M
6.03%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECT vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DECT and ARLU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.94

The correlation between DECT and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECT vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECT
DECT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DECT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DECT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECT vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DECTARLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.32

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.01

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.66

9.00

+7.66

DECT vs. ARLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECT Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the ARLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECT and ARLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DECTARLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.75

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

1.00

+0.37

Drawdowns

DECT vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECT drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECT and ARLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECTARLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-15.38%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.11%

-9.66%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.53%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-2.23%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

2.15%

-0.88%

Volatility

DECT vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) is 1.65%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that DECT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECTARLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

2.63%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

8.73%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.68%

11.13%

-2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.23%

12.56%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

12.56%

-2.33%

DECT vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DECT and ARLU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

DECT vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECT nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DECT and ARLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ARLU has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to DECT (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECT dropped -13.26% vs ARLU's -15.38%.

On 1-year performance, DECT leads with 21.15% vs 19.35% for ARLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, DECT has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DECT has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 19.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECT and ARLU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

DECT and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DECT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECT and ARLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer