PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECT vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECT vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECT achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMZY's 10.52% return.


DECT

1D
0.56%
1M
0.68%
6M
6.76%
YTD
7.67%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.39%

AMZY

1D
12.51%
1M
10.78%
6M
8.94%
YTD
10.52%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.19M$2.74M$4.75M
$328.94K$302.52K$385.62K

DECT vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DECT
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF
7.67%15.04%11.86%3.36%
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
10.52%10.39%35.28%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DECT and AMZY is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.62

The correlation between DECT and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECT vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DECT
DECT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DECT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DECT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DECT vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECTAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.09

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

0.48

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.47

1.06

+11.41

DECT vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECT Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECT and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECT vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECT drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECT and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECTAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-23.70%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.11%

-19.61%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

-23.70%

+10.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.31%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-5.58%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

8.94%

-7.62%

Volatility

DECT vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) is 2.35%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that DECT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECTAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

13.48%

-11.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

21.27%

-14.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

27.98%

-18.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.17%

26.08%

-15.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

26.08%

-15.91%

DECT vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECT vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

DECT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.74%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
46.74%52.59%47.91%9.90%
DECT
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF
0.00%0.00%0.43%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DECT and AMZY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to DECT (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECT dropped -13.26% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 3-year performance, AMZY leads with 24.27% vs 12.59% for DECT. On fees, DECT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, DECT has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 46.74%, compared with 0.00% for DECT.

DECT is categorized as Options Trading, while AMZY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DECT and 1.09% for AMZY.

DECT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECT and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer