DECO vs. XRPZ

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds. DECO is actively managed, while XRPZ is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DECO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.

Performance

DECO vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECO achieves a 68.66% return, which is significantly higher than XRPZ's -39.48% return.

DECO

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -5.00%
• 6M: 43.76%
• YTD: 68.66%
• 1Y: 108.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRPZ

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -13.12%
• 6M: -48.50%
• YTD: -39.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECO vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	68.66%	3.86%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	-39.48%	-11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DECO and XRPZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

DECO vs. XRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECO

DECO Risk / Return Rank: 83
DECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DECO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DECO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

XRPZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECO vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DECO	XRPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.67	—	—

Drawdowns

DECO vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECO drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum XRPZ drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECO and XRPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECO	XRPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.71%	-55.39%	+7.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-52.09%	+44.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.25%	-33.79%	+22.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DECO	XRPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.89%	71.41%	-27.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.81%	71.41%	-20.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.81%	71.41%	-20.60%

DECO vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

DECO vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison

DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	0.69%	1.16%	1.73%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECO and XRPZ in my portfolio?

DECO and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DECO or XRPZ?

On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DECO or XRPZ?

XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DECO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DECO or XRPZ?

DECO has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.

What is the main difference between DECO and XRPZ?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DECO and 0.19% for XRPZ.