DECO vs. XRPZ
DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds. DECO is actively managed, while XRPZ is passively managed. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DECO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.
Performance
DECO vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DECO achieves a 69.59% return, which is significantly higher than XRPZ's -41.03% return.
DECO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 52.64%
- YTD
- 69.59%
- 1Y
- 107.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 83.90%
XRPZ
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -33.18%
- YTD
- -41.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $78.29K | $85.73K | $119.46K | |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | $2.25M | $2.57M | $3.39M |
DECO vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 69.59% | 3.86% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -41.03% | -11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECO and XRPZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECO vs. XRPZ — Risk / Return Rank
DECO
XRPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DECO vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DECO | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DECO vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECO drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum XRPZ drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECO and XRPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECO | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.71% | -55.39% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | -53.32% | +46.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -35.33% | +24.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.59% | — | — |
Volatility
DECO vs. XRPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECO | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.11% | 69.03% | -21.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.84% | 69.03% | -17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.84% | 69.03% | -17.19% |
DECO vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DECO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DECO vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison
DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.68% | 1.16% | 1.73% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DECO and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DECO.
DECO has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DECO and 0.19% for XRPZ.
Find the right allocation for DECO and XRPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer