PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECO vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECO achieves a 69.59% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 30.13% return.


DECO

1D
0.38%
1M
1.45%
6M
52.64%
YTD
69.59%
1Y
107.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
83.90%

XLK

1D
4.98%
1M
3.49%
6M
31.87%
YTD
30.13%
1Y
43.26%
3Y*
30.60%
5Y*
20.15%
10Y*
24.33%
ALL TIME*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$78.29K$85.73K$119.46K
$1.76B$1.67B$2.24B

DECO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DECO and XLK is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.70

The correlation between DECO and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DECO vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DECO
XLK

Financial Services

51.7%

-

Technology

43.9%
99.1%

Industrials

4.4%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Communication Services

-

0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DECO
51.7%
XLK

-

Technology

DECO
43.9%
XLK
99.1%

Industrials

DECO
4.4%
XLK
0.1%

Basic Materials

DECO
1.8%
XLK

-

Communication Services

DECO

-

XLK
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DECO

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

DECO

-

XLK

-

Energy

DECO

-

XLK
0.2%

Healthcare

DECO

-

XLK

-

Real Estate

DECO

-

XLK

-

Utilities

DECO

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DECO
DECO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DECO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECOXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

2.73

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

7.35

+3.87

DECO vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECO Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECO and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECO drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECO and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECOXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.71%

-82.05%

+34.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.60%

-15.92%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.09%

-5.59%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-34.79%

+23.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.59%

5.90%

+3.69%

Volatility

DECO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) has a higher volatility of 19.26% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 10.47%. This indicates that DECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECOXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.26%

10.47%

+8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.67%

22.23%

+14.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.11%

25.96%

+21.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.84%

25.86%

+25.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.84%

24.96%

+26.88%

DECO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than XLK's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DECO
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
0.68%1.16%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.42%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


DECO and XLK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECO has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to XLK (10.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECO dropped -47.71% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 1-year performance, DECO leads with 107.22% vs 43.26% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 10.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DECO has performed better with a 107.22% return vs 43.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DECO.

DECO has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.42% for XLK.

DECO is categorized as Blockchain, while XLK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DECO and 0.08% for XLK.

DECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECO and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer