DECO vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. DECO is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, DECO returned 146.58% vs 1296.25% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. DECO charges 0.65%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

DECO vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECO achieves a 74.25% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 769.73% return.

DECO

• 1D: -2.84%
• 1M: 11.41%
• YTD: 74.25%
• 6M: 65.42%
• 1Y: 146.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: -18.59%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 769.73%
• 6M: 723.00%
• 1Y: 1,296.25%
• 3Y*: 109.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECO vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	74.25%	42.48%	31.48%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	769.73%	96.22%	-34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DECO and BWET is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	-0.02

Return for Risk

DECO vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECO

DECO Risk / Return Rank: 90
DECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DECO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DECO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECO vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DECO	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	13.17	-9.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	5.71	-2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.83	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.76	42.79	-37.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.03	136.82	-120.79

DECO vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 13.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECO and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DECO vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECO drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECO and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECO	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.71%	-56.90%	+9.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.60%	-30.64%	+5.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.54%	-23.05%	+18.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.40%	-23.76%	+12.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.18%	9.87%	-0.69%

Volatility

DECO vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) is 12.99%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 32.83%. This indicates that DECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DECO	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.99%	32.83%	-19.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.79%	91.75%	-57.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.95%	100.33%	-55.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.31%	71.24%	-19.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.31%	71.24%	-19.93%

DECO vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DECO vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

DECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	0.66%	1.16%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECO and BWET in my portfolio?

DECO and BWET have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DECO or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (32.83%) compared to DECO (12.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECO dropped -47.71% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, DECO or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1296.25% vs 146.58% for DECO. On fees, DECO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DECO has been the lower-risk option at 12.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DECO or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1296.25% return vs 146.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DECO or BWET?

DECO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DECO or BWET?

DECO has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between DECO and BWET?

DECO is categorized as Blockchain, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DECO and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.17 vs 3.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.