PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECK vs. SYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DECK vs. SYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Synchrony Financial (SYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECK achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than SYF's -11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, DECK has outperformed SYF with an annualized return of 26.25%, while SYF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.56% annualized return.


DECK

1D
-2.30%
1M
-4.65%
6M
3.33%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
26.25%
ALL TIME*
14.95%

SYF

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.46%
6M
-7.71%
YTD
-11.29%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
31.18%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.56%
ALL TIME*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECK vs. SYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.36%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%69.83%31.97%59.44%44.88%
SYF
Synchrony Financial
-11.29%30.64%74.01%19.76%-27.43%36.40%-0.08%57.48%-37.84%8.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DECK and SYF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2014

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DECK:

$14.45B

SYF:

$24.69B

EPS

DECK:

$7.02

SYF:

$9.97

PE Ratio

DECK:

14.81

SYF:

7.36

PEG Ratio

DECK:

0.54

SYF:

0.70

PS Ratio

DECK:

2.77

SYF:

1.33

PB Ratio

DECK:

5.89

SYF:

1.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

DECK:

$5.47B

SYF:

$19.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DECK:

$3.16B

SYF:

$12.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

DECK:

$1.31B

SYF:

$4.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECK vs. SYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SYF
SYF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECK vs. SYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Synchrony Financial (SYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECKSYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.07

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

0.24

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.12

0.49

-0.37

DECK vs. SYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECK Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the SYF Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECK and SYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECK vs. SYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECK drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than SYF's maximum drawdown of -66.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECK and SYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECKSYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-66.37%

-27.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.81%

-27.61%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.35%

-37.75%

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.35%

-46.65%

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.35%

-66.37%

+2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.37%

-16.35%

-37.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.39%

-16.97%

-23.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.42%

13.29%

+4.13%

Volatility

DECK vs. SYF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is 11.02%, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that DECK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECKSYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.02%

12.90%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.81%

24.71%

+7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.82%

31.26%

+14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.10%

36.88%

+7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.55%

39.39%

+3.16%

Dividends

DECK vs. SYF - Dividend Comparison

DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYF
Synchrony Financial
1.63%1.38%1.54%2.51%2.74%1.90%2.54%2.39%3.07%1.45%0.72%

Financials

DECK vs. SYF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Synchrony Financial. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.12B
5.60B
(DECK) Total Revenue
(SYF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DECK vs. SYF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Synchrony Financial over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
57.6%
82.7%
Portfolio components
DECK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

SYF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a gross profit of 4.64B and revenue of 5.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.7%.

DECK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

SYF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported an operating income of 914.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

DECK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

SYF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a net income of 805.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DECK and SYF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYF has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to DECK (11.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECK dropped -94.36% vs SYF's -66.37%.

SYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECK and SYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer