DE vs. BGS
DE (Deere & Company) and BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. DE operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while BGS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, DE returned 23.07%/yr vs -14.86%/yr for BGS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DE vs. BGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DE achieves a 24.40% return, which is significantly higher than BGS's -2.65% return. Over the past 10 years, DE has outperformed BGS with an annualized return of 23.07%, while BGS has yielded a comparatively lower -14.86% annualized return.
DE
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 24.40%
- 6M
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- 23.07%
BGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.79%
- 10Y*
- -14.86%
DE vs. BGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DE Deere & Company | 24.40% | 11.39% | 7.56% | -5.48% | 26.59% | 28.86% | 57.96% | 18.30% | -2.90% | 54.83% |
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -2.65% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between DE and BGS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
DE:
$17.76
BGS:
-$0.96
DE:
3.40
BGS:
0.18
DE:
$46.01B
BGS:
$1.81B
DE:
$16.40B
BGS:
$388.44M
DE:
$11.54B
BGS:
$91.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DE vs. BGS — Risk / Return Rank
DE
BGS
DE vs. BGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deere & Company (DE) and B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DE | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.07 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 0.16 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 0.47 | +0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DE vs. BGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DE drawdown since its inception was -73.27%, smaller than the maximum BGS drawdown of -86.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DE and BGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DE | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.27% | -86.50% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.90% | -33.11% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.59% | -67.36% | +45.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.81% | -84.68% | +50.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.91% | -86.50% | +48.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -83.99% | +71.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -32.06% | +13.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.58% | 11.32% | -1.74% |
Volatility
DE vs. BGS - Volatility Comparison
Deere & Company (DE) has a higher volatility of 10.51% compared to B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) at 9.65%. This indicates that DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DE | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | 9.65% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.42% | 33.85% | -9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.03% | 51.42% | -21.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 49.32% | -19.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 46.31% | -15.91% |
Dividends
DE vs. BGS - Dividend Comparison
DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than BGS's 18.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 18.86% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
DE Deere & Company | 1.12% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.75% | 1.84% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 3.15% |
Financials
DE vs. BGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deere & Company and B&G Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DE vs. BGS - Profitability Comparison
DE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported a gross profit of 3.33B and revenue of 9.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
DE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
DE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported a net income of 656.00M and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DE and BGS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DE has higher volatility (10.51%) compared to BGS (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DE dropped -73.27% vs BGS's -86.50%.
DE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DE and BGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer