PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDX vs. RULE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DDX vs. RULE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DDX vs. RULE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DDX
Defined Duration 10 ETF
1.04%12.02%2.93%10.48%-16.19%0.14%
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
5.57%4.60%7.59%6.29%-22.87%1.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDX achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than RULE's 5.57% return.


DDX

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
1.04%
6M
2.76%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
10Y*

RULE

1D
2.49%
1M
-6.00%
YTD
5.57%
6M
5.32%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DDX vs. RULE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RULE's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DDX vs. RULE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDX
DDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

RULE
RULE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDX vs. RULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDXRULEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

0.88

+0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

1.29

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.37

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

5.36

+3.08

DDX vs. RULE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the RULE Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDX and RULE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDXRULEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.88

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

-0.03

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between DDX and RULE is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DDX vs. RULE - Dividend Comparison

DDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
DDX
Defined Duration 10 ETF
3.52%3.17%3.11%2.41%1.38%1.14%
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.01%0.01%0.00%

Drawdowns

DDX vs. RULE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum RULE drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDX and RULE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DDXRULEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-30.48%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.41%

-12.65%

+8.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.92%

-7.15%

+4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-15.50%

+8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

3.24%

-2.09%

Volatility

DDX vs. RULE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) is 2.62%, while Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that DDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RULE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DDXRULEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

8.24%

-5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

15.26%

-11.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

19.40%

-13.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

13.94%

-6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

13.94%

-6.44%