DDX vs. MPRO
DDX (Defined Duration 10 ETF) and MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. DDX is actively managed, while MPRO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DDX returned 8.16%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for MPRO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for MPRO.
Performance
DDX vs. MPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDX achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than MPRO's 5.93% return.
DDX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MPRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- —
DDX vs. MPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 4.86% | 12.02% | 2.93% | 10.48% | -16.19% | 1.34% |
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 5.93% | 9.33% | 8.37% | 10.55% | -9.38% | 4.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDX and MPRO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DDX and MPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
DDX vs. MPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDX
MPRO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
DDX
MPRO
Technology
DDX
MPRO
Industrials
DDX
MPRO
Healthcare
DDX
MPRO
Consumer Cyclical
DDX
MPRO
Consumer Defensive
DDX
MPRO
Communication Services
DDX
MPRO
Energy
DDX
MPRO
-
Basic Materials
DDX
MPRO
-
Utilities
DDX
MPRO
-
Real Estate
DDX
MPRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDX vs. MPRO — Risk / Return Rank
DDX
MPRO
DDX vs. MPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDX | MPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.28 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 8.99 | +2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDX | MPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 1.95 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.74 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
DDX vs. MPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than MPRO's maximum drawdown of -14.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDX and MPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDX | MPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -14.51% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.41% | -5.67% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | -9.64% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.87% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -3.46% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.43% | -0.34% |
Volatility
DDX vs. MPRO - Volatility Comparison
Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) at 1.74%. This indicates that DDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDX | MPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 1.74% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.46% | 5.02% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.47% | 6.64% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 9.25% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 9.22% | -1.74% |
DDX vs. MPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MPRO's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDX vs. MPRO - Dividend Comparison
DDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than MPRO's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 3.39% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.41% | 1.38% | 1.14% |
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.09% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDX and MPRO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to MPRO (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDX dropped -21.27% vs MPRO's -14.51%.
On 3-year performance, MPRO leads with 9.93% vs 8.16% for DDX. On fees, DDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MPRO has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for MPRO.
DDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.88% for MPRO.
They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and Monarch. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDX and 1.17% for MPRO.
DDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDX and MPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer