PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDX vs. INCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDX vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDX achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than INCM's 6.45% return.


DDX

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.02%
YTD
4.86%
6M
5.43%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
10Y*

INCM

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.70%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.84%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDX vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DDX
Defined Duration 10 ETF
4.86%12.02%2.93%4.69%
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
6.45%13.07%6.80%5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DDX and INCM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023

0.74

The correlation between DDX and INCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDX vs. INCM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDX
INCM

Financial Services

21.9%
8.2%

Technology

15.4%
2.4%

Industrials

14.5%
1.9%

Healthcare

10.3%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
6.7%

Communication Services

6.0%
1.7%

Energy

5.0%
3.8%

Basic Materials

5.0%
1.9%

Utilities

3.5%
4.9%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.0%

Financial Services

DDX
21.9%
INCM
8.2%

Technology

DDX
15.4%
INCM
2.4%

Industrials

DDX
14.5%
INCM
1.9%

Healthcare

DDX
10.3%
INCM
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DDX
8.7%
INCM
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

DDX
7.1%
INCM
6.7%

Communication Services

DDX
6.0%
INCM
1.7%

Energy

DDX
5.0%
INCM
3.8%

Basic Materials

DDX
5.0%
INCM
1.9%

Utilities

DDX
3.5%
INCM
4.9%

Real Estate

DDX
2.7%
INCM
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDX vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDX
DDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

INCM
INCM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDX vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDXINCMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.57

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

4.95

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

20.86

-9.15

DDX vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the INCM Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDX and INCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDXINCMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

3.01

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.51

-1.14

Drawdowns

DDX vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDX and INCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDXINCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-7.84%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.41%

-3.19%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.75%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-1.09%

-6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.76%

+0.33%

Volatility

DDX vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison

Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) at 1.66%. This indicates that DDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDXINCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

1.66%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

3.82%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.47%

5.25%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

7.23%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.48%

7.23%

+0.25%

DDX vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDX vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

DDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than INCM's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DDX
Defined Duration 10 ETF
3.39%3.17%3.11%2.41%1.38%1.14%
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
5.08%4.96%5.06%3.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDX and INCM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to INCM (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDX dropped -21.27% vs INCM's -7.84%.

On 1-year performance, INCM leads with 15.73% vs 12.79% for DDX. On fees, DDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INCM has performed better with a 15.73% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for INCM.

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 3.39% for DDX.

They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDX and 0.38% for INCM.

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDX and INCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer