PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 10.42%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
0.40%
1M
2.50%
YTD
7.16%
6M
9.88%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
10.42%

USFR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
7.16%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.60%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and USFR is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2016

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDWMUSFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

15.11

-13.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

50.64

-48.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

13.43

-12.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

203.42

-201.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.39

787.84

-780.45

DDWM vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 15.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDWMUSFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

15.11

-13.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

9.26

-8.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

3.07

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.60

-0.90

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-1.36%

-33.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-0.02%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-0.06%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-0.18%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-0.80%

-34.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

0.00%

-2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-0.16%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

0.01%

+2.86%

Volatility

DDWM vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

0.06%

+3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

0.18%

+10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

0.27%

+12.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.32%

0.40%

+12.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

0.81%

+14.51%

DDWM vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.31%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.91%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and USFR have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDWM has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs USFR's -1.36%.

On 10-year performance, DDWM leads with 10.42% vs 2.47% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.31% for DDWM.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.15% for USFR.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.11 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer