DDWM vs. MOAT
DDWM (WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDWM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DDWM returned 10.95%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for MOAT. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDWM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
DDWM vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 10.95%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
DDWM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
DDWM vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund | 7.47% | 30.07% | 10.70% | 15.25% | -0.77% | 14.84% | -4.56% | 21.43% | -11.75% | 18.80% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDWM and MOAT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between DDWM and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DDWM vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDWM
MOAT
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Industrials
DDWM
MOAT
Financial Services
DDWM
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
DDWM
MOAT
Technology
DDWM
MOAT
Healthcare
DDWM
MOAT
Consumer Defensive
DDWM
MOAT
Basic Materials
DDWM
MOAT
-
Communication Services
DDWM
MOAT
Utilities
DDWM
MOAT
-
Energy
DDWM
MOAT
-
Real Estate
DDWM
MOAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDWM vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
DDWM
MOAT
DDWM vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDWM | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 1.02 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.73 | 3.11 | +3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDWM vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDWM | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.00% | -33.31% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -12.43% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | -21.44% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -23.96% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -33.31% | -1.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -4.45% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -3.83% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 4.06% | -1.13% |
Volatility
DDWM vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDWM | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 4.13% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 9.90% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 13.93% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 18.20% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 18.68% | -3.37% |
DDWM vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDWM vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than MOAT's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund | 2.31% | 2.47% | 3.57% | 4.46% | 4.28% | 3.73% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 4.40% | 2.65% | 4.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDWM and MOAT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDWM has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.47% vs 10.95% for DDWM. On fees, DDWM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDWM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.36% for MOAT.
DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.47% for MOAT.
DDWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDWM and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer