PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 10.95%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
0.43%
1M
0.58%
YTD
7.47%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
10.95%

MOAT

1D
0.41%
1M
3.19%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
14.57%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
7.47%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.66%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and MOAT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.70

The correlation between DDWM and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDWM vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
MOAT

Industrials

21.1%
13.8%

Financial Services

20.7%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
7.3%

Technology

9.0%
33.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
17.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%

-

Communication Services

5.4%
2.4%

Utilities

5.2%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Real Estate

3.0%
0.8%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
MOAT
13.8%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.7%
MOAT
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.6%
MOAT
7.3%

Technology

DDWM
9.0%
MOAT
33.8%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.6%
MOAT
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.4%
MOAT
17.0%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.5%
MOAT

-

Communication Services

DDWM
5.4%
MOAT
2.4%

Utilities

DDWM
5.2%
MOAT

-

Energy

DDWM
3.7%
MOAT

-

Real Estate

DDWM
3.0%
MOAT
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.16

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.02

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

3.11

+3.62

DDWM vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-33.31%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-12.43%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-21.44%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-23.96%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-33.31%

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-4.45%

+2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.83%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

4.06%

-1.13%

Volatility

DDWM vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.13%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

9.90%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

13.93%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

18.20%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

18.68%

-3.37%

DDWM vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than MOAT's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.31%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and MOAT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDWM has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.47% vs 10.95% for DDWM. On fees, DDWM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDWM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.36% for MOAT.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.47% for MOAT.

DDWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer