PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than BUFI's 6.77% return.


DDWM

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.71%
6M
5.28%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
10.64%
ALL TIME*
10.83%

BUFI

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.60%
6M
4.45%
YTD
6.77%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$181.70K$602.68K$512.75K
$5.12M$4.14M$4.85M

DDWM vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
9.49%30.07%-0.83%
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
6.77%16.50%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and BUFI is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.89

The correlation between DDWM and BUFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDWM vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMBUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.61

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

10.48

-3.13

DDWM vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the BUFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and BUFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMBUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-7.43%

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-5.69%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.60%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-0.84%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.41%

+1.52%

Volatility

DDWM vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) have volatilities of 3.29% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMBUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.43%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

7.96%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

9.04%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

9.28%

+4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

9.28%

+5.79%

DDWM vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.52%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and BUFI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFI has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to DDWM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs BUFI's -7.43%.

On 1-year performance, DDWM leads with 21.99% vs 14.79% for BUFI. On fees, DDWM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 21.99% return vs 14.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDWM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.69% for BUFI.

DDWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer