PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. AVEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 27.59% return.


DDWM

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.18%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.98%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
10.36%

AVEM

1D
-1.39%
1M
8.65%
YTD
27.59%
6M
29.75%
1Y
55.00%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.51%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%5.78%
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
27.59%34.48%7.49%15.30%-18.15%5.16%14.39%11.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and AVEM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.72

The correlation between DDWM and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
AVEM

Industrials

21.1%
9.2%

Financial Services

20.6%
20.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
2.8%

Technology

8.1%
32.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
3.1%

Communication Services

5.5%
5.4%

Utilities

5.5%
2.6%

Basic Materials

5.4%
8.1%

Energy

4.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.6%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
AVEM
9.2%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.6%
AVEM
20.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.3%
AVEM
9.2%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.8%
AVEM
2.8%

Technology

DDWM
8.1%
AVEM
32.3%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.5%
AVEM
3.1%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.5%
AVEM
5.4%

Utilities

DDWM
5.5%
AVEM
2.6%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.4%
AVEM
8.1%

Energy

DDWM
4.1%
AVEM
5.1%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.1%
AVEM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDWMAVEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

2.84

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

3.65

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.51

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

4.21

-2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

16.70

-9.71

DDWM vs. AVEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the AVEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and AVEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDWMAVEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.84

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.54

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.66

+0.04

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, roughly equal to the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and AVEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMAVEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-36.05%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-13.13%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-18.02%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-34.00%

+19.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-1.39%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-10.09%

+6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.30%

-0.43%

Volatility

DDWM vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 3.80%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMAVEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

8.33%

-4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

16.72%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

19.45%

-6.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

18.34%

-5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

20.55%

-5.24%

DDWM vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than AVEM's 1.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.33%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and AVEM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to DDWM (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs AVEM's -36.05%.

On 5-year performance, DDWM leads with 12.22% vs 9.92% for AVEM. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.98% for AVEM.

DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.33% for AVEM.

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and AVEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer