PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.04% return.


DDWM

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.18%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.98%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
10.36%

AVDV

1D
-0.73%
1M
3.98%
YTD
16.04%
6M
19.54%
1Y
44.23%
3Y*
28.01%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.51%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%6.03%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
16.04%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and AVDV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.87

The correlation between DDWM and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
AVDV

Industrials

21.1%
21.3%

Financial Services

20.6%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
14.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
2.1%

Technology

8.1%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
3.4%

Communication Services

5.5%
2.0%

Utilities

5.5%
1.7%

Basic Materials

5.4%
22.5%

Energy

4.1%
10.8%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.1%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
AVDV
21.3%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.6%
AVDV
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.3%
AVDV
14.4%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.8%
AVDV
2.1%

Technology

DDWM
8.1%
AVDV
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.5%
AVDV
3.4%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.5%
AVDV
2.0%

Utilities

DDWM
5.5%
AVDV
1.7%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.4%
AVDV
22.5%

Energy

DDWM
4.1%
AVDV
10.8%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.1%
AVDV
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDWMAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.52

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.37

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

13.67

-6.68

DDWM vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDWMAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.86

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.80

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.80

-0.11

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-43.01%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-13.19%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-14.17%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-28.08%

+13.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-1.35%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-6.77%

+2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.24%

-0.37%

Volatility

DDWM vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 3.80%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

4.92%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

13.07%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

15.56%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

17.30%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

19.73%

-4.42%

DDWM vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than AVDV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.74%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.33%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and AVDV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to DDWM (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 12.22% for DDWM. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.33% for DDWM.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer