PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDVCX vs. BUFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDVCX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDVCX achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than BUFBX's 14.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DDVCX has underperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 6.75%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.


DDVCX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.78%
6M
2.83%
YTD
8.20%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
6.75%
ALL TIME*
6.75%

BUFBX

1D
0.13%
1M
3.53%
6M
9.54%
YTD
14.30%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
9.85%
ALL TIME*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DDVCX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDVCX
Nomura Value Fund Class C
8.20%9.95%5.68%1.06%-4.57%20.87%-0.63%19.33%-3.92%12.51%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
14.30%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%18.76%-7.01%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DDVCX and BUFBX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2002

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between DDVCX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDVCX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDVCX
DDVCX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DDVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DDVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDVCX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDVCXBUFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

4.42

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

14.28

-10.03

DDVCX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDVCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDVCX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDVCX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDVCX drawdown since its inception was -54.29%, which is greater than BUFBX's maximum drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDVCX and BUFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDVCXBUFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.29%

-39.78%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-4.45%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.71%

-12.85%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.71%

-14.67%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.60%

-35.51%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

0.00%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-4.71%

-4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

1.38%

+1.81%

Volatility

DDVCX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) is 2.90%, while Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that DDVCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDVCXBUFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.73%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

7.75%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

9.81%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

13.47%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.60%

+1.44%

DDVCX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDVCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDVCX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

DDVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.25%, more than BUFBX's 7.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
7.97%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%
DDVCX
Nomura Value Fund Class C
24.25%26.55%30.88%10.78%9.46%23.96%1.92%4.13%5.29%3.08%1.57%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDVCX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFBX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to DDVCX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDVCX dropped -54.29% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

BUFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDVCX and BUFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer