DDV vs. STOT
DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) and STOT (State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds, while STOT is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index. DDV is actively managed, while STOT is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for STOT.
Performance
DDV vs. STOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDV achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than STOT's 0.97% return.
DDV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STOT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
DDV vs. STOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.23% | 0.71% |
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 0.97% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDV and STOT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDV vs. STOT — Risk / Return Rank
DDV
STOT
DDV vs. STOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDV | STOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.06 | 1.11 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
DDV vs. STOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDV drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum STOT drawdown of -6.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDV and STOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDV | STOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -6.07% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.07% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -0.84% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
DDV vs. STOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDV | STOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68% | 1.11% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.68% | 1.73% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.68% | 2.20% | +0.48% |
DDV vs. STOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than STOT's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDV vs. STOT - Dividend Comparison
DDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than STOT's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 4.41% | 4.52% | 5.10% | 4.53% | 2.54% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 1.95% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDV and STOT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.
STOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
DDV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while STOT is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDV and 0.45% for STOT.
Find the right allocation for DDV and STOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer