PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDV vs. JABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDV vs. JABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDV achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than JABS's 1.29% return.


DDV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JABS

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDV vs. JABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDV and JABS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDV vs. JABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDV vs. JABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDVJABSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.06

2.23

-0.17

Drawdowns

DDV vs. JABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDV drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, which is greater than JABS's maximum drawdown of -0.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDV and JABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDVJABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-0.97%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.12%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-0.18%

-0.17%

Volatility

DDV vs. JABS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDVJABSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68%

2.00%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

2.00%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.68%

2.00%

+0.68%

DDV vs. JABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JABS's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDV vs. JABS - Dividend Comparison

DDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than JABS's 4.19% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDV and JABS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.

JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

DDV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while JABS is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDV and 0.33% for JABS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDV and JABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer