DDV vs. FLDB

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) and FLDB (Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds, while FLDB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DDV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FLDB.

Performance

DDV vs. FLDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDV achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than FLDB's 1.63% return.

DDV

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 2.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLDB

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDV vs. FLDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF	2.29%	0.47%
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	1.63%	0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DDV and FLDB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

DDV vs. FLDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLDB

FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDV vs. FLDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDV	FLDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.54	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	8.14	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.07	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	24.91	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	91.30	—

Drawdowns

DDV vs. FLDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDV drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, which is greater than FLDB's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDV and FLDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDV	FLDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-0.49%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	0.00%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-0.05%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDV	FLDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68%	0.92%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.68%	1.31%	+1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.68%	1.31%	+1.37%

DDV vs. FLDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDB's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DDV vs. FLDB - Dividend Comparison

DDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than FLDB's 4.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF	1.21%	0.42%	0.00%
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	4.44%	4.72%	3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDV and FLDB in my portfolio?

DDV and FLDB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDV or FLDB?

On fees, FLDB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDV or FLDB?

FLDB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDV or FLDB?

FLDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

What is the main difference between DDV and FLDB?

DDV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FLDB is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDV and 0.20% for FLDB.